I have just successfully concluded defending a lawsuit brought against a farmer engaging in fairly unique activities. The farmer grows various types of aquaculture products, air plants, or lichen on things like driftwood or different types of rocks. These products are used as decorative features or in aquariums. 

Local neighbors complained about these processes, resulting in the township filing a lawsuit seeking to terminate the operation. Fortunately, I was opposed by a reasonable attorney willing to look at the law as a whole and not assume that farming was limited to corn, soybeans, or livestock. While this farm is unique, perhaps the only operation of its kind in Michigan, it was engaging in agricultural activities. While there was some processing of the products, it was practically no different than a farmer growing poinsettias, putting them in pots, and decorating the pots with colorful foil.

My client agreed that it would be better to invest in some upgrades to their facilities to mollify neighbor complaints than seek to prevail in litigation. Doing so was less costly, less time consuming, and demonstrated their willingness to be a good neighbor. After meeting with municipal officials and explaining the operation, we were able to negotiate a consent judgment that trumps the local zoning ordinance. That consent judgment recognizes the farmer's ability to continue the operation. In exchange, the farmer agreed to some site upgrades, like planting buffer trees and limiting the area in which some activities are undertaken away from the complaining neighbors. While NIMBY (not in my backyard) neighbors may not be satisfied, the township was. It was a good result obtained relatively inexpensively. The result was possible through knowledge of the Right to Farm Act.

If you are experiencing difficulties with your local municipality regarding your farming operations, please do not hesitate to contact me.