ABOUT

Clark Hill is an international team of legal advisors focused on delivering exceptional growth for your business. With locations spanning across the United States, Ireland, and Mexico, we work in agile, collaborative teams, partnering with our clients to help them reach and exceed their business goals. For more information, please visit clarkhill.com

 

 

 

 

Login

 

CONTACT

Stephon B. Bagne

Member, Clark Hill PLC

Phone: (313) 965-8897

Fax: (313) 309-6897

Email: sbagne@clarkhill.com

 

Stephon B. Bagne’s expertise in representing property owners in condemnation cases is widely recognized. Stephon has represented all types of property owners in a variety of situations including vacant and improved property, partial and total takings, easement and fee acquisitions, involving commercial and residential properties. He has won jury trials in courts throughout the State of Michigan and successfully defended those verdicts before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Stephon has prevailed in challenges of the necessity of takings and negotiated less onerous acquisitions in partial taking matters. He regularly speaks and writes about eminent domain and other real estate law issues for a variety of professional organizations. For a more complete bio, please click here.

 

 

 

 

« Court of Appeals Upholds Broad Attorney Fee Reimbursement After Successful Challenges | Main | Michigan Supreme Court Refuses to Restrict Inverse Condemnation in Flint Water Case »
Monday
Aug172020

Ann Arbor Seeking Right of Way for LynAnne-Arbana Sewer Project

Ann Arbor is seeking grants of new easements in an area north of Dexter Avenue and West Huron Street, between Lyn Anne Court and Arbana Drive.

The City is initiating the process of obtaining right of way for LynAnne-Arbana Sewer Project. Project information can be found here. A map of the project is partially reproduced below and also available on the City’s website.

The City recently mailed letters to property owners.  Those letters are not good-faith offers and do not comply with MCL 213.55.  They do not make an offer of just compensation, do not include the proposed easement document, and are not addressed to all the owners of the properties, as defined by MCL 213.51 and required by MCL 213.55.  Rather, the letters ask property owners to contact a “neutral third-party facilitator to support discussions.”

It appears that the City is seeking new, expanded permanent easements as well as temporary easements.  The City is not publicizing the easement form, although they are rather presumptuously inviting property owners to “receive the applicable easement documentation for your review and signature as soon as it is available.”  The City makes no mention of paying just compensation.

Pipeline easements can result in significant diminutions in the value of property, particularly if they involve clear cutting of trees or above-ground structures to be constructed. I have no opinion about the “neutral third-party facilitator” as I am not familiar with him or his company, but I have run into right of way agents that do not tell property owners about the rights that they enjoy. This blog post and this other post detail some of their chicanery. This post discusses a bait and switch that I observed in good faith offer appraisals. 

This post summarizes some key issues that must be evaluated when a pipeline is taken. 

If you have received one of the City’s letters and are interested in talking about it, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>