ABOUT

Clark Hill is an international team of legal advisors focused on delivering exceptional growth for your business. With locations spanning across the United States, Ireland, and Mexico, we work in agile, collaborative teams, partnering with our clients to help them reach and exceed their business goals. For more information, please visit clarkhill.com

 

 

 

 

Login

 

CONTACT

Stephon B. Bagne

Member, Clark Hill PLC

Phone: (313) 965-8897

Fax: (313) 309-6897

Email: sbagne@clarkhill.com

 

Stephon B. Bagne’s expertise in representing property owners in condemnation cases is widely recognized. Stephon has represented all types of property owners in a variety of situations including vacant and improved property, partial and total takings, easement and fee acquisitions, involving commercial and residential properties. He has won jury trials in courts throughout the State of Michigan and successfully defended those verdicts before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Stephon has prevailed in challenges of the necessity of takings and negotiated less onerous acquisitions in partial taking matters. He regularly speaks and writes about eminent domain and other real estate law issues for a variety of professional organizations. For a more complete bio, please click here.

 

 

 

 

« ROW Sought Following MPSC Approval to Construct 55 Miles of Natural Gas Pipeline in Clinton, Shiawassee, Ingham, Livingston, and Washtenaw Counties | Main | Frankfort Airport Seeking Easement Rights »
Tuesday
Jun082021

State Legislature Evaluating Zoning Law Modifications Limiting Local Control

Bills relating to short term vacation rental and gravel mining zoning regulations test competing principles of government.

The Michigan legislature is evaluating two laws relating to local zoning ordinances.

This article describes efforts to preempt local communities from regulating gravel mining.

This article discusses legislation to limit communities from restricting short term vacation rentals.

Laws like these force legislators to prioritize principles that are often complementary but are competing in these instances. These laws get to the heart of the debate about whether private property rights versus the impacts on neighboring properties are more important. They also relate to whether decisions should be made by larger, centralized government or left to local control. The mining debate also implicates the balance between environmental preservation versus the economy, particularly since mined sand and gravel are used for public infrastructure projects and transportation costs are a large percentage of the cost of the products.  

Regardless of where the power to regulate these issues is vested, there may be private remedies available to aggrieved neighboring property owners. For example, Michigan law recognizes that neighbors may sue neighbors to enjoin certain uses that constitute nuisances.

I have handled zoning and nuisance issues generally and been involved in matters relating to gravel mines and vacation home rentals. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>